B761 <=> B763 (BTG XXXIX The holy planet “Purgatory,” p. 762)

“And now, my boy, after everything that I have elucidated to you we can return to the question why and how ‘higher-being-bodies’ or, as your favorites name them, souls, began to arise in our Universe, and why our UNI-BEING COMMON FATHER turned HIS Divine attention particularly to just these cosmic arisings.

“The point is that when the ‘common-cosmic-harmonious-equilibrium’ had become regularized and established in all those cosmoses of different scales, then in each of these Tetartocosmoses, i.e., in each separate relatively-independent-formation-of-the-aggregation-of-microcosmoses’ which had its arising on the surface of the planets – the surrounding conditions on the surface of which accidentally began to correspond to certain data present in these cosmoses, owing to which they could exist for a certain period of time without what is called ‘Seccruano,’ i.e., without constant ‘individual tension’ – the possibility appeared of independent automatic moving from one place to another on the surface of the given planets.

“And thereupon, when our COMMON FATHER ENDLESSNESS ascertained this automatic moving of theirs, there then arose for the first time in HIM the Divine Idea of making use of it as a help for HIMSELF in the administration of the enlarging World.

“From that time on HE began to actualize everything further for these cosmoses in such a direction that the inevitable what is called, ‘Okrualno’ – i.e., the periodic repetition in them of the completing process of the sacred Heptaparaparshinokh – might be accomplished in such a way that, under conditions of a certain kind of change in the functioning of the common presences of some of these Tetartocosmoses, there might be transformed and crystallized, besides the crystallizations which had to be transformed for the purpose of the new common-cosmic exchange of substances, also those active elements from which new independent formations might be coated in them themselves with the inherent possibility of acquiring ‘individual Reason.’